Bug #25347
closedTCA type "select", renderMode "tree", maxitems = 1 doesn't work
100%
Description
I want to use the new TCA tree, but when I configure 1 as maxitems I can't select a tree node.
This happens, because this.countSelectedNodes in t3lib\js\extjs\tree\tree.js is 1 even when I create a new record. And this.countSelectedNodes is 1 because $valueArray in t3lib\tceforms\class.t3lib_tceforms_tree.php in the function renderField always has at least one entry.
$valueArray is created by exploding $PA['itemFormElValue']. In fresh records $PA['itemFormElValue'] is 0 and not NULL (or not set) and has no other effects. But $valueArray has an entry and that's why count($valueArray) is 1 and then this.countSelectedNodes is also 1.
To fix this issue $PA['itemFormElValue'] should be only exploded when it's not 0. Like I worte, this is done in t3lib\tceforms\class.t3lib_tceforms_tree.php and fixed in the appended patch.
Fixing this issue causes a little follow up in t3lib\js\extjs\tree\tree.js. This is also fixed in the patch.
I hope the patch file's syntax is correct, this is my first git patch ;-)
(issue imported from #M17976)
Files
Updated by Marco Huber over 13 years ago
To reproduce this issue you can use this TCA (Thanks to Steffen: http://lists.typo3.org/pipermail/typo3-team-core/2010-November/044931.html):
$GLOBALS['TCA']['pages']['columns']['fe_group']['config']['renderMode']
= 'tree';
$GLOBALS['TCA']['pages']['columns']['fe_group']['config']['maxitems'] = 1;
$GLOBALS['TCA']['pages']['columns']['fe_group']['config']['treeConfig']
= array(
'parentField' => 'subgroup',
'appearance' => array(
'expandAll' => TRUE,
'showHeader' => TRUE,
)
);
Updated by Anonymous over 13 years ago
- Status changed from New to Resolved
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
Applied in changeset 9b3bf788c17538a22374cf21117c229317d5148c.
Updated by Helmut Hummel over 13 years ago
- Status changed from Resolved to Under Review
- Target version changed from 0 to 4.5.3
In master this was merged: https://review.typo3.org/1188
In 4-5 there is a nicer version of this panding: https://review.typo3.org/1211
I still prefer this in favour of what is suggested in #25820
Updated by Marco Huber over 13 years ago
- Status changed from Under Review to Resolved
Applied in changeset 3019ca92f55faf650ad5981a001e323a2e91eab6.
Updated by Oliver Hader over 13 years ago
- Status changed from Resolved to Closed