Task #94455
closed[TASK] Fix minor spelling in Backend-locallang
100%
Description
There are some tiny small typos in the file
`typo3/sysext/backend/Resources/Private/Language/locallang_layout.xlf` line 370 ff:
`This means that moving and element or setting meta information like start- or endtime will be taken from the original content and you will not be able to set these values on a translated content element.<br>`
Should be
`This means that moving an element or setting meta information like start- or endtime will be taken from the original content and you will not be able to set these values on a translated content element.<br>`
And in file
`typo3/sysext/backend/Resources/Private/Language/locallang_mfa.xlf` line 67 ff:
`Selected MFA provider has to be active to perfom this action!`
All three labels should be
`Selected MFA provider has to be inactive to perform this action!`
Updated by Oliver Bartsch over 3 years ago
- Status changed from New to Needs Feedback
Hi, thanks for your report.
While I fully acknowledge the first typo, I don't get the second one. Those three labels are used for different errors, so why should they contain the same message? See the corresponding label key and their usage in the MFA controller.
Updated by Gerrit Code Review over 3 years ago
- Status changed from Needs Feedback to Under Review
Patch set 1 for branch master of project Packages/TYPO3.CMS has been pushed to the review server.
It is available at https://review.typo3.org/c/Packages/TYPO3.CMS/+/69681
Updated by Oliver Bartsch over 3 years ago
Oliver Bartsch wrote in #note-1:
Hi, thanks for your report.
While I fully acknowledge the first typo, I don't get the second one. Those three labels are used for different errors, so why should they contain the same message? See the corresponding label key and their usage in the MFA controller.
Oke, got it. It's about "perfom" => "perform".
Updated by Preben Rather Sørensen over 3 years ago
And sorry for being inaccurate.
I guess it's the way (issue=>PR) even in these minor cases?
Updated by Oliver Bartsch over 3 years ago
Yes, the workflow was completely right. I just didn't grasp the bug on the first read.
Updated by Gerrit Code Review over 3 years ago
Patch set 2 for branch master of project Packages/TYPO3.CMS has been pushed to the review server.
It is available at https://review.typo3.org/c/Packages/TYPO3.CMS/+/69681
Updated by Anonymous over 3 years ago
- Status changed from Under Review to Resolved
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
Applied in changeset b914574b1617ded9c427e4605213687a9eb59dfa.
Updated by Gerrit Code Review over 3 years ago
- Status changed from Resolved to Under Review
Patch set 1 for branch 10.4 of project Packages/TYPO3.CMS has been pushed to the review server.
It is available at https://review.typo3.org/c/Packages/TYPO3.CMS/+/69683
Updated by Anonymous over 3 years ago
- Status changed from Under Review to Resolved
Applied in changeset e3538f3743e6c67548175f6de0f8f03c52a0999c.