addUnionStatement does not respect MM_match_fields
it seems that we have another part in persistence of extbase where MM_match_fields was not implemented.
I have added a query like that:
Because of the dot inside parseOperand() calls method addUnionStatement and here we have to add MM_match_fields, too.
Updated by Stefan Froemken about 7 years ago
Good Morning Frans,
as you can see in the ticket the union statement will only be added if propertypath contains a dot. Sure, I can change it to categories.title, but the result is the same. My test checks, if mm_match_fields is also considered in case of union statements.