Revert fix for #63275 until concept is worked out and agreed upon
It may be a useful feature, but then it must be documented as such.
Even more important, it needs to be evaluated whether the comments given by Sebastian are valid or not: https://forge.typo3.org/issues/7848#note-5
How is the decision here? What is the reasoning on why the comments are not valid?
How does "contains" compare to "in" now? What are the differences and how should these be documented?
I prepare a revert until these things are worked out.
Revert "[BUGFIX] Typo3DbQueryParser: Use IN with array-operand2"
This reverts commit e235c9ad8b32267ece98d843a43daeab430db235.