Bug #85158
closed
Sliding defect?
0%
Description
I asked in typo3.slack.com/#typo3-cms-coredev but got no answer (https://typo3.slack.com/archives/C03AM9R17/p1528118815000522)
two people asked for help as inheritage of values does not work
First is documented on SO: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50147844/typo3-meta-tag-author-how-to-use-both-name-and-email/50154561#50154561.
the other was in slack https://typo3.slack.com/archives/C024TUMM7/p1528115417000533
Now I'm no longer sure about the expected behaviour: do I have wrong memories or understanding?
AFAIK the slide with `-1` should include values from current page.
according to these people it does not work (any more) except you override with values from current page.
Can anyone inspect if the field slide mechanism is broken?
Updated by Frans Saris over 6 years ago
You added the fields to $GLOBALS["TYPO3_CONF_VARS"]["FE"]["addRootLineFields"]?
Updated by Frans Saris over 6 years ago
- Related to Bug #84144: RootlineUtility is enriching all related fields added
Updated by Bernd Wilke over 6 years ago
as I only noticed the strange behaviour in the solution of others, I can not give more hints. you might contact them.
I think the fields are added to $GLOBALS["TYPO3_CONF_VARS"]["FE"]["addRootLineFields"]
relation to #84144:
from the description it sound that all fields were inherited, also they were not mentioned in the addRootLineFields.
with bug #84144: does it make a difference whether a field is declared correctly or not?
maybe: "with bug #84144 you need to do an override otherwise the value of current page is ignored"?
according to the mentioned user an override is neccesary for the expected result.
Updated by Susanne Moog over 4 years ago
- Status changed from New to Closed
Just tested it again and the override is indeed unnecessary. Minimal example:
- add "author" to rootline fields
- clear caches
- add typoscript:
page {
30 = TEXT
30 {
data = levelfield:-1,author,slide
}
}