Bug #22889
closedRearrange before / after fields in 4.5
0%
Description
I looked at the latest backend work on 4.4. I really like how it is looking but have one suggestion. In a content element the before and after fields do not seem to be logically grouped for me. I have attached a screenshot. The view labelled current is how it is now. I have also supplied an option A & B which I think are more logical. I prefer Option A.
(issue imported from #M14735)
Files
Updated by Ron Hall over 14 years ago
After thinking a bit more, I think I have an even better arrangement for before and after fields. I have attached a revised screenshot. I now prefer option C.
Updated by Chris topher over 14 years ago
Thanks for the tests!
I like versions A and C - somehow C a bit more than A.
Version B has longer ways between the two fields. Considering that one might want to use both, that is not ideal. Furthermore that arrangement does not look that nicely.
Updated by Steffen Ritter over 14 years ago
since this has been reverted,this one does not apply anymore,
postponed to 4.5, where whe hopefully have a refactored tceforms
Updated by Chris topher about 14 years ago
TCEForms have been refreshed now. The current solution comes close to your idea B.
Ron, what do you think?
Updated by Ron Hall about 14 years ago
Hi Christopher,
I saw your note asking for feedback on #0014735 about the before after fields. I setup a site using 4.5 trunk and took a look. The appearance of the fields looks fine. However, I wonder about the labels. For a CSS person like me the current "top-margin" and "bottom-margin" are fine, but I wonder if "space before" and "space after" would be better terminology for general editors.
I will say the rearrangement of many fields in the text with image CE is concerning to me. Some of the moves do not make sense to me, but that is not the subject of this report and I will need to think about it a bit more.
Thanks,
Ron
Updated by Jo Hasenau about 14 years ago
Hi Ron - Maybe we can Skype about that.
The new positions of the fields have been discussed a lot, but they follow certain rules we made before the rearrangement.
But we wanted to ask you native speakers about the labels anyway, since we are pretty sure about the German labels, but still open for suggestions of the default labels.
There are some labels that have been changed on purpose though, like "hide" => "disable", because we want to make sure that they describe the action connected to the field better than before.
So when you are looking for labels you should do the same we did: Try to forget anything you know about TYPO3 and imagine you are a complete newbie.
Updated by Dmitry Dulepov over 13 years ago
- Status changed from Needs Feedback to Closed
- Target version deleted (
0)
No feedback provided within 90 days. Closing the issue.