Bug #24961
closedImprove t3lib_extMgm::addToAllTCAtypes performance
0%
Description
Almost 40% of a BE AJAX call is consumed by t3lib_extMgm::addToAllTCAtypes().
This method should be improved performance-wise, if possible.
(issue imported from #M17489)
Files
Updated by Steffen Gebert almost 14 years ago
.. and also 14% of page module rendering
Updated by Jo Hasenau almost 14 years ago
is this just a problem of quality or quantity?
In other words: Is the code too slow or are there too many superfluous calls?
Updated by Steffen Gebert almost 14 years ago
I don't know, if we could save calls. It's called 20 times in the attached example call, which consume too much time every call.
Updated by Jo Hasenau almost 14 years ago
Attached patch changes the most obvious things.
It removes preg_replace where it was not necessary.
It replaces strstr with strpos.
It removes a for each loop in favor of array_diff and array_intersect_key.
Updated by Jo Hasenau almost 14 years ago
Attached V2 that adds a missing array_unique to remove doubles from the insertionArray as well.
Updated by Jigal van Hemert almost 14 years ago
Did someone actually measure if array functions are faster? Helmut showed me today that a foreach is sometimes faster.
Instead of the if-with-strpos maybe rtrim($item, '0123456789') will be faster?
BTW Regular expressions are often surprisingly fast (highly optimized library)
Updated by Jo Hasenau almost 14 years ago
@Jigal van Hemert: We won't know if it's faster until we will test different functions in the same context.
Currently I haven't got a testing environment available, but I guess Steffen can tell us if the changes had any impact compared to his first results.
Depending on the context foreach might be faster than some of the array functions but usually this is only true for large arrays, which we don't use in this function.
At least intersect_key should be quite fast, since it will work on keys and therefor can use stuff which is already optimized by PHP.
We could change array_unique(blah) to array_flip(array_flip(blah)) and of course there are lots of other options we could try to optimize it.
This is why I didn't post an RFC yet. So we can try to find the best solution for our use case first and maybe later on we can port it to other places in the core that are using similar approaches.
Regarding the regExp I would say that they are currently used in the right place, namely to split up both the insertionList and the current list into a multidimensional array, which is always significantly faster than a nested foreach loop.
The question is, if we really need this kind of array at all or if it might be possible to tackle the whole task with regExp (preg_replace) only.
Updated by Jo Hasenau almost 14 years ago
Attached another version with optimized order of conditions in if clauses and
if ($item{0} == '-') {
$item = rtrim($item, '0123456789');
}
as a strpos replacement.
Updated by Jo Hasenau almost 14 years ago
Using Xdebug and WinCacheGrind I found out that the original removeDuplicatesForInsertion was much faster than the one with the array functions - BUT: the rest was significantly faster
So a combination of the last patch with the original removeDuplicatesForInsertion runs up to 4 times faster than the original addToAllTCAtypes.
Attached is v6 that currently seems to be the fastest
Updated by Steffen Gebert almost 14 years ago
ACK. I profiled v6 against original code:
file original v6 v6/orig ------------------------------------------ backend.php 11,74% 5,69% 48,47% ajax.php 25,80% 14,44% 55,97% ajax.php 23,48% 11,52% 49,06% ajax.php 29,15% 13,04% 44,73% ajax.php 25,21% 19,93% 79,06% ajax.php 26,86% 11,58% 43,11% ajax.php 29,99% 18,88% 62,95% alt_intro.php 13,90% 5,06% 36,40% ajax.php 32,27% 32,08% 99,41% alt_intro.php 14,07% 6,50% 46,20% ajax.php 3,75% 16,43% 48,68%
The table shows the percentage spent for addToAllTCAtypes during one backend call
Updated by Alexander Opitz over 10 years ago
- Status changed from New to Needs Feedback
- Target version deleted (
0) - TYPO3 Version set to 4.5
- Is Regression set to No
What is the state of this issue?
In the 6.x line of TYPO3 many things changed for TCA, so is this issue still valid?
Updated by Alexander Opitz over 10 years ago
- Status changed from Needs Feedback to Closed
No feedback within the last 90 days => closing this ticket.
If you think that this is the wrong decision or experience this issue again, then please write to the mailing list typo3.teams.bugs with issue number and an explanation or open a new ticket and add a relation to this ticket number.