Table field name no_search and description in pages properties flatly contradict each other
- The table.field name `no_search`and description flatly contradict each other: no_search <=> "Include in Search" and green (on) <=> no_search=0. This is unnecessarily confusing. The visual control does fit the text and the number fits the field name, but 0 shouldn't be green (on) when in all other cases 0 is grey (off).
- Are these controls in general properly usable for color-blind people? Because if not that would make it hard to use, especially if 1 does not always mean on.
Better might be to change "Include in search" to "Do not include in search" and green to correspond with 1?
Updated by Martin Kutschker 7 months ago
1) Who cares about the internals? The label says "include in search" so it is green (active) when the page is included in search. The fact that the field is 0 to achieve the effect is of no concern to the user.
You see the value only in "dev mode". The user should know what she is doing if enabling the mode.
I suggest to add a hint that the field value is inverted, eg [!0], ! or [0, inverted] for power users.
2) This issue has been resolved in #84881