Task #102978
openEXT:form Improvement: Do not render pencil Icons for forms that are not editable
0%
Description
In the backend module "Forms", editable and uneditable forms both have a pencil icon rendered in the action button. For uneditable forms the button is a disabled with the pencil beeing mildly opaque. This is very hard to see:
So for locked forms, that are not editable, we should use a different icon instead. For example the lock icon.
Files
Updated by Daniel Goerz 10 months ago
- Related to Feature #102979: EXT:form Improvement: Make list of forms filterable added
Updated by Daniel Goerz 10 months ago
- Related to Feature #102865: Add PSR-14 Event to modify loaded form definition added
Updated by Daniel Goerz 9 months ago
- Related to Feature #103266: EXT:form Improvement: Introduce Possibility for Validators at form level added
Updated by Daniel Goerz 9 months ago
- Related to Feature #103267: EXT:form Improvement: Field identifier should be editable added
Updated by Georg Ringer 6 months ago
- File form-lock-icon.png form-lock-icon.png added
how it looks now
Updated by Gerrit Code Review 6 months ago
- Status changed from New to Under Review
Patch set 1 for branch main of project Packages/TYPO3.CMS has been pushed to the review server.
It is available at https://review.typo3.org/c/Packages/TYPO3.CMS/+/84401
Updated by Annett Jähnichen 6 months ago
Hi,
I'm not quite sure about the lock icon.
In most places in the backend (list module) we render an empty field or the button not at all instead of a disabled button.
Maybe that would be the better option here?
Updated by Gerrit Code Review about 1 month ago
Patch set 2 for branch main of project Packages/TYPO3.CMS has been pushed to the review server.
It is available at https://review.typo3.org/c/Packages/TYPO3.CMS/+/84401
Updated by Daniel Goerz about 1 month ago
Annett Jähnichen wrote in #note-7:
Hi,
I'm not quite sure about the lock icon.
In most places in the backend (list module) we render an empty field or the button not at all instead of a disabled button.
Maybe that would be the better option here?
I think "render an empty field or the button not at all" would also be a great improvement.