Bug #35210
closedindexed search errors etc. after update
0%
Description
After the update to 4.7 the search page shows a number of errors starting with:
#1283790586: There is no entry in the $TCA array for the table "index_config". This means that the function enableFields() is called with an invalid table name as argument.
In the backend these errors are shown (4 times):
PHP Warning
PHP Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /home/typo3_src/typo3_src-4.7.0beta2/t3lib/l10n/parser/class.t3lib_l10n_parser_llphp.php line 95
Changing the plugin to Indexed Search (Experimental) removes the errors in the frontend, but the ones in the backend remain.
The pagination is gone. Searching does not seem to show the correct results.
The update of Indexed Search seems to be very important with the complaints there are about the slow search.
So both variants there are now do not seem to function as they should.
Updated by Ben van 't Ende over 12 years ago
Looks like search markers are not respected when using experimental ()
Updated by Eric Chavaillaz over 12 years ago
I confirm this error after upgrade :
#1283790586: There is no entry in the $TCA array for the table "index_config". This means that the function enableFields() is called with an invalid table name as argument.
If I not use the experimental plugin...
Updated by Anders Gissel over 12 years ago
Bug is present in 4.7 release as well, even after several database compare/updates, and a reinstall just for the heck of it.
Updated by Dietmar Adrian over 12 years ago
For me I found a simple work around under TYPO3 4.7.0:
In file sysext/indexed_search/ext_tables.php: comment two lines:
line 41
#if (t3lib_extMgm::isLoaded('crawler')) {
and line 62
#}
This allows to load table index_config into $TCA even if the crawler extension is not loaded.
Updated by Felix Kopp over 12 years ago
- Status changed from New to Resolved
Applied in changeset 505855aeacdc1364425611e6ac2a28e74c96b122.
Updated by Tomasz Krawczyk almost 12 years ago
Could you, please, add this fix to the 4.6 branch? I've noticed this bug in 4.6.12.