Bug #39989
closedSame form twice in one template: hidden fields for empty values are only rendered once
0%
Description
If you use nearly the same form twice in one template, the hidden fields for empty values are only rendered for the upper form.
In Tx_Fluid_ViewHelpers_Form_AbstractFormFieldViewHelper::renderHiddenFieldForEmptyValue the Tx_Fluid_ViewHelpers_FormViewHelper is checked and this also contains the $hiddenFieldNames of the upper form.
Updated by Anja Leichsenring almost 12 years ago
- Project changed from 534 to 2559
- Category changed from 959 to Fluid: Core
- Target version deleted (
1843)
Updated by Alexander Opitz about 10 years ago
- Status changed from New to Needs Feedback
Hi,
was this issue fixed or does it still exists?
Updated by Alexander Opitz almost 10 years ago
- Status changed from Needs Feedback to Closed
No feedback within the last 90 days => closing this issue.
If you think that this is the wrong decision or experience this issue again, then please write to the mailing list typo3.teams.bugs with issue number and an explanation or open a new ticket and add a relation to this ticket number.
Updated by Anja Leichsenring almost 10 years ago
- Project changed from 2559 to TYPO3 Core
- Category deleted (
Fluid: Core) - Status changed from Closed to New
- Assignee set to Marc Bastian Heinrichs
- TYPO3 Version set to 6.2
- Is Regression set to No
MaBa said he takes care.
Updated by Riccardo De Contardi over 8 years ago
- Category set to Fluid
Is still valid for the latest master?
Updated by Claus Due about 8 years ago
- Status changed from New to Closed
Closed as duplicate even though this is the original issue. The actual duplicate is under review: https://forge.typo3.org/issues/78551
Updated by Marc Bastian Heinrichs about 8 years ago
No prob. Is smarter to fix a days old issue than a four years old one ;-)
Updated by Nicole Cordes about 8 years ago
Sorry I didn't find this one during my forge research. There isn't any mention that checkboxes or radio buttons are involved. Seems I don't what I should have search for.
Updated by Marc Bastian Heinrichs about 8 years ago
no prob, really. I'm happy that this will be fixed now since I failed to push a fix.