TYPO3 Core

Ingmar Schlecht wrote:

@Steffen Kamper: Could you have a look at this issue? I think you implemented the tree feature, right?

Hello Ingmar,

I hope I tried it right. I successfully used the tree in some of my extensions without using mm-relations. Those worked fine.

I tried to adpot the following example snipplet for mm-relations. But all I got was the tt_address Group-Title. I also tried to modify it in some ways to set the "tt_address_group" table in the tca-config - or is this unnessecary as it will be resolved using the mm-table by TCA-processing?

TCA Definition

'config' => array (
    'type' => 'select',
    'internal_type' => 'db',
    'size' => 20,
    'minitems' => 0,
    'maxitems' => 999,
    'foreign_table' => 'tt_address',
    'foreign_table_where' => 'ORDER BY tt_address.uid',
    'MM' => 'tt_address_group_mm',
    'renderMode' => 'tree',
    'treeConfig' => array(
//     'rootUid' => 214,
        'parentField' => 'pid',
        'appearance' => array(
            'expandAll' => TRUE,
            'showHeader' => TRUE,
            'maxLevels' => 2,
        )
    ),
),

This is what I expected to get:

[Tree Root]
 |
 [+]_tt_Address_Group "Group A" 
 |   |
 |   |_ tt_Address A in Group A
 |   |_ tt_Address B in Group A
 |
 [+]_tt_Address_Group "Group B" 
 |   |_ tt_Address C in Group B
 |   |_ tt_Address D in Group B
[..]

I am right that this should be working? This is what I would expect on a tree using MM-Relation.

Best regards
Gabriel

Seems like this is not working with MM-tables yet.

Is there something new on this?

I think a tree-function like this makes really sense. But making it usable with one table only (without table relations) makes it usable only in some basic terms.

Jigal van Hemert wrote:

It does work with MM-relations, but not through a chain of relations like in your example.

Well does this simply mean it does completly not work and is not planned to be working?
Or is there something I can improve on my current configuration to make it work?

I tried nearly everything but as already told didn't get it work like shown as example above.