Bug #48568

Relation table match fields not respected for relation tables

Added by Helmut Hummel almost 8 years ago. Updated 14 days ago.

Status:
Needs Feedback
Priority:
Must have
Assignee:
-
Category:
Extbase
Target version:
-
Start date:
2013-05-27
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
TYPO3 Version:
6.2
PHP Version:
Tags:
Complexity:
Is Regression:
No
Sprint Focus:

Description

When parsing a comparison the Typo3DbBackend does not
respect match fields which leads to more results than expected
if the relation table is used for more than one table (e.g. sys_category)


Related issues

Related to TYPO3 Core - Task #6249: Support for TCA fields of type "group" - allowes DAM support (has patch)Closed2010-01-27

Actions
#1

Updated by Gerrit Code Review almost 8 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Under Review

Patch set 1 for branch master has been pushed to the review server.
It is available at https://review.typo3.org/21084

#2

Updated by Gerrit Code Review almost 8 years ago

Patch set 1 for branch master has been pushed to the review server.
It is available at https://review.typo3.org/21113

#3

Updated by Anja Leichsenring almost 8 years ago

  • Target version changed from 2337 to Extbase 6.3
#4

Updated by Anja Leichsenring almost 8 years ago

  • Target version changed from Extbase 6.3 to Extbase 6.2
#5

Updated by Franz Koch over 6 years ago

it's partly related to #6249 I guess, which also contains the fix for this IIRC. Unfortunately gerrit is unavailable atm so I coudln't check if the proposed patch here catches all cases

#6

Updated by Alexander Opitz over 6 years ago

  • Project changed from 534 to TYPO3 Core
  • Category changed from Extbase: Generic Persistence to Extbase
  • Target version changed from Extbase 6.2 to next-patchlevel
  • TYPO3 Version set to 6.2
  • Is Regression set to No
#7

Updated by Wouter Wolters over 6 years ago

  • Status changed from Under Review to New
#8

Updated by Mathias Schreiber over 5 years ago

  • Target version deleted (next-patchlevel)
#9

Updated by Benni Mack 14 days ago

  • Status changed from New to Needs Feedback

Hey Helmut,

I looked through the code in v10 and v11, and also have a categories relational setup running, which works without problems in v10/v11. Can you recheck this please?

Also available in: Atom PDF