Feature #20107
closedImage Resizing / Thumbnails with GD2 instead of ImageMagick
0%
Description
Please make use of GD2 (if available) to resize images if ImageMagick is not available.
I know that there are extensions like "jb_gd_resize", but they don't fix the backend thumbnails and somehow the images are 50% smaller than the target size.
Thanks in advance.
(issue imported from #M10568)
Updated by Chris topher about 14 years ago
Here is a patch by Jan Bednarik:
http://bugs.typo3.org/file_download.php?file_id=411&type=bug
(Yes, quite old, but shows the idea.)
Updated by Alexander Opitz over 11 years ago
- Status changed from New to Needs Feedback
- Target version deleted (
0) - TYPO3 Version set to 4.2
As this report is very old, is the handling in newer TYPO3 CMS Versions (like 6.0/6.1) more like you expect it?
Updated by Alexander Opitz over 11 years ago
- Status changed from Needs Feedback to New
Updated by Mathias Schreiber almost 10 years ago
- Status changed from New to Needs Feedback
- Is Regression set to No
How do we deal with TIFF, AI, PDF, etc?
Like with everything that GD cannot handle?
Updated by Alexander Opitz over 9 years ago
- Category set to Image Cropping
- Status changed from Needs Feedback to New
Yes think so.
Updated by Riccardo De Contardi about 9 years ago
- Tracker changed from Bug to Feature
Updated by Susanne Moog about 7 years ago
- Category changed from Image Cropping to Image Generation / GIFBUILDER
Updated by Markus Klein over 6 years ago
- Related to Task #78600: Replace getimagesize() by \TYPO3\CMS\Core\Type\File\ImageInfo() added
Updated by Benni Mack about 6 years ago
- Status changed from New to Rejected
Hey,
we've decoupled the functionality of Image Generation now in a very flexible way which all runs through FAL, which can be extended (e.g. we use this for generating images via a Serverless Infrastructure).
TYPO3 Core does exactly that now: We build a flexible API in core, so people can actually "do whatever they want" with it. Core shouldn't deliver all kinds of flexibility (I could think of using Imagine API instead of ImageMagick), but IMHO we're fine currently as it has grown with going FAL all in.
Hope that's ok. Sorry for the massive delay, let me know if you reconsider and open up a new ticket if so.